🇮🇪 Early Learning & Care · Level 5 and Level 6 · Aistear & Síolta Linked

Qqi Childcare Early Learning Assignment Help

Childcare assessment runs on observations, and an observation without a framework link is a lovely story about a child that evidences nothing. Add 150 placement hours across two age bands in Tusla-registered settings, parental consent to manage, and a portfolio that has to prove every outcome — and the writing becomes the hard part, not the working with children. Our reviewers check your observations, reflections and portfolio against the criteria, and against Aistear and Síolta.

  • Every observation checked for its Aistear theme and Síolta standard link
  • Reviewers from Irish early years settings, not general academic writing
  • Child and setting anonymity checked before an assessor ever sees it
  • Covers the new ELC awards and the older ECCE 5M2009 route
  • Level 6 Stage 2 progression work reviewed to the same standard
  • Returned ready for you to finalise — you make every edit yourself
Check My Childcare Portfolio →
150Placement Hours Minimum
2Age Bands to Evidence
4+12Aistear Themes, Síolta Principles
€35Review Price From
👀Observations
🧩Aistear
⭐Síolta
🧸Play
🛡Child Protection

Get Your Free Quote Now

Fill in details — we reply within 10 minutes

No file chosen
🔒 Confidential ⚡ 10 Min Reply ✅ No Commitment
Observations Audited
Aistear Themes Linked
Síolta Standards Checked
Children Kept Anonymous
Every Source Verified
Early Years Reviewers

Which Students Come to Us for Early Learning Assignment Help?

Almost nobody on an early years course struggles with the children. They struggle with the paperwork the children generate. A four-year-old builds a tower, knocks it down, laughs and rebuilds it — and you have to turn that into a dated observation, an analysis of schema and fine motor development, a link to an Aistear theme and a Síolta standard, a reflection, and a next-step plan. Doing that once is fine. Doing it fifteen times across two placements while working the floor is where learners come unstuck.

🍼 Baby rooms🧸 Toddler rooms 🎨 Preschool & ECCE🏫 Afterschool ♿ SNA settings📍 All 26 counties
Send My Observations →
Early learning and care observation portfolio being checked against Aistear and Síolta
✅ Framework-Linked Review

🧩 Every Observation Traced to a Framework

Aistear's themes and Síolta's standards are what an early years assessor reads for. We check each observation names the right one, and that the link is argued rather than asserted — "this supports Exploring and Thinking because…" rather than a tag at the end.

👀 Observation Before Interpretation

The most common fault we see is judgement written into the record — "she was frustrated", "he was being difficult". An observation records what was seen and heard; the analysis comes after. Mixing them costs marks in every single entry.

🛡 Children Stay Unidentifiable

Your portfolio describes real children in a named setting. We flag anything identifying — full names, the setting's name, a photo, an age combined with a specific need — and check your consent arrangements are referenced where your brief expects them.

📝 Reflection That Names a Next Step

Early years reflection isn't about how the session felt. It's about what you noticed, what it told you about that child's development, and what you would provide next. That final part is where most portfolios simply stop.

⏱ Placement Hours Planned, Not Panicked

150 hours across two age bands in Tusla-registered settings doesn't leave room for a late realisation. Send work early and we'll flag which age band or which evidence type you're short on while you still have weeks to fix it.

👶 Reviewers From Early Years Rooms

A general proofreader can fix a comma. Someone who has run a preschool room can tell you your schema analysis doesn't match the behaviour you described — which is the comment that actually moves a band.

Common Challenges

What Gets a Childcare Portfolio Sent Back? Five Faults We Fix

Five patterns turn up in nearly every early years portfolio that gets referred. None of them are about how good you are with children.

Framework Links Bolted On at the End

"This links to Aistear: Exploring and Thinking." One line, no explanation, tacked below the observation. Assessors want the connection reasoned out — which aspect, why this behaviour demonstrates it, what it tells you about the child.

Judgement Written Into the Observation

"He was upset." "She didn't want to share." Both are interpretations, and both belong in the analysis section, not the record. An observation says what a camera would have caught — the words, the actions, the sequence.

The Same Method Fifteen Times

Fifteen narrative observations because that's the one that felt comfortable. Most briefs expect a range — time samples, event samples, checklists — because each shows something different about a child's development.

One Age Band Missing Entirely

Hours completed, but almost all of them with preschoolers. The requirement spans babies and toddlers as well as older children, and a portfolio weighted heavily to one band gets flagged even when the total hours are fine.

Children Identifiable in the Portfolio

A first name, the setting's name, a photograph, an age paired with a specific additional need. Individually harmless, together identifying — and a problem in its own right before any grading question arises.

Sound Familiar?

All five are fixable from observations you've already written — usually by adding the reasoning you did in your head but never put on the page.

Get My Portfolio Checked →
Observation Methods

Narrative or Time Sample? Choosing the Observation That Scores

Most briefs ask for a range rather than a favourite. Each method reveals something different, and choosing the wrong one for what you're trying to show is a quiet, common mark-loser.

Most used

Narrative / Running Record

A continuous account of what a child did over a short period, written in the present tense as it happens. Rich detail, but easy to slip into interpretation. Best for capturing a full play sequence or a social interaction unfolding.

Pattern

Time Sample

What a child is doing at fixed intervals across a session. Shows patterns a narrative can't — where they gravitate, how long they sustain attention, whether they play alone or alongside others.

Trigger

Event Sample

Records every occurrence of a specific behaviour with what came before and after. The right choice when you're trying to understand a recurring situation rather than describe a moment.

Milestone

Checklist

Quick, structured and useful for developmental milestones — but limited on its own. Assessors want to see you know what it can't tell you, which is usually the missing sentence in a checklist entry.

Social

Sociogram

Maps who plays with whom. Strong evidence for the social dimension of development and for spotting a child on the edge of the group — and rarely used, which makes it stand out in a portfolio.

Evidence

Work Samples and Learning Stories

A drawing, a construction, a photo of a completed puzzle — with a caption tying it to development. Uncaptioned work samples evidence nothing, and portfolios are full of them.

The marks

The Analysis That Follows Each One

Whichever method you use, the marks sit in what comes after — what the observation tells you about that child's development, which framework link it evidences, and what you would plan next as a result.

Not sure your observations show enough range?

Send the portfolio and your criteria sheet. We'll tell you which methods you've used, which are missing, and whether the analysis under each is carrying its marks.

Audit My Observations
How It Works

Upload Your Childcare Assignment Today, Audited by Tomorrow

Five steps built around placement schedules and shift work. No account to create, nothing to pay until you've seen the price.

1

Send Portfolio & Brief

Upload observations, reflections, your placement record or the whole portfolio, plus the criteria sheet. Partial work is fine and usually more useful.

2

Quote in 10 Minutes

A firm price and turnaround before you commit. One observation, one module or a full portfolio — all quoted upfront.

3

Matched to an Early Years Reviewer

Your work goes to someone who has worked in Irish early years settings and knows Aistear and Síolta as practice, not just as documents.

4

Framework & Anonymity Audit

Each outcome marked met, partly met or not evidenced. Every framework link checked. Children and settings checked for identifying detail. Sources verified.

5

You Rewrite, We Answer

A prioritised fix list, and you make every change yourself. Follow-up questions cost nothing — most learners send one and that's it.

Start My Childcare Review →
People Who Have Run the Room

Your ELC Observations Land With Someone Who Ran the Room

Early years evidence is judged on whether your analysis matches what actually happened with the child. That needs a reader who has stood in a preschool room at eleven in the morning, not someone applying a rubric they've only read about. Reviewers here come from Irish early years practice and take only the components they know.

4Aistear Themes
12Síolta Principles
5 yrsMinimum Sector Experience
24 hrsPriority Turnaround

How Early Years Reviewers Are Vetted

  • A recognised early childhood or education qualification
  • At least five years in Irish early learning and care settings
  • Working knowledge of Aistear, Síolta and the ELC award standards
  • Benchmarked sample reviews before any learner work is assigned
  • Trained on child anonymity and safeguarding in written evidence
EK Eimear KavanaghBA Early Childhood Studies · 12 years

"An observation without a framework link is a nice story about a child. The connection is where the mark actually sits."

Aistear & SíoltaPortfolios5N17735N1764
4.9 / 5Early learning lead reviewer
FL Fiona LynchRoom Leader, baby & toddler rooms · 13 years

"Everyone observes the preschoolers because they talk. The baby room evidence is thinner and it's the band that's missing in most portfolios."

0–2 yrs EvidenceCare RoutinesPlacement
4.9 / 5Infant and toddler practice
DK Dr. Órla KeanePhD Child Development, FET lecturer · 15 years

"Naming a schema is not analysis. Show me the behaviour that led you there and what you'd put out tomorrow because of it."

Child DevelopmentAnalysisLevel 6
4.9 / 5Development theory & Level 6
AR Anita ReillyReg. Social Care Worker · 11 years disability services

"Anonymise while you write. Reconstructing an observation afterwards to hide a detail always weakens the evidence you needed."

Inclusion5N1786Anonymisation
4.9 / 5Additional needs & inclusion
Get Matched to a Reviewer →
By the Numbers

Short on ELC Placement Hours? 150 Across Two Age Bands

From the ELC award standards and typical assessment briefs. Confirm the exact requirements against your own programme handbook — providers vary in how they split the hours.

150Minimum Placement Hours
2Settings Minimum, Tusla-Registered
120Credits in the Major Award
4Aistear Themes to Evidence
80%Needed for a Distinction
24 hrsPriority Turnaround
Aistear & Síolta

Naming Aistear Isn't Linking It — Here's What Assessors Want

These two frameworks sit behind almost every criterion on an Irish early years award. Aistear is the curriculum framework — what children learn. Síolta is the quality framework — how well the setting supports it. Assessors expect you to use both, and to explain rather than label.

Aistear themeWhat it coversWhat weak evidence looks like
Well-beingPhysical and psychological health, resilience, a child's sense of security"The child was happy" — no behaviour recorded that shows it
Identity and BelongingSense of self, family and culture valued, feeling part of the groupA photo of a family wall with no observation attached to it
CommunicatingLanguage, expression, listening, non-verbal and emerging literacyQuoting what the child said without analysing the language use
Exploring and ThinkingCuriosity, problem-solving, schema, early mathematical thinkingNaming a schema with nothing in the observation supporting it
Síolta standardsQuality of the environment, interactions, play, curriculum, transitionsReferenced once in the introduction and never again
Both togetherWhat the child was learning, and how the setting enabled itAistear used throughout, Síolta ignored entirely — very common
1

Date and Context

Date, setting type, age in months, who else was present, what was happening around it. Undated observations look retrospective and read as invented.

2

Objective Record

What a camera would have caught. Actions, words, sequence. No adjectives about mood — those belong in the next section.

3

Development Analysis

What this tells you across physical, cognitive, language, social and emotional domains — supported by a named theorist or source.

4

Framework Link

The Aistear theme and aim, the Síolta standard, and a sentence explaining why this behaviour evidences them.

5

Next Steps

What you would provide, change or extend tomorrow because of what you saw. Specific and achievable, not "continue to support".

6

Consent & Anonymity

Initials not names, no setting name, permission referenced where your brief requires it. Check before submission, not after.

Check My Observations Against These →
Awards & Modules

On ECCE 5M2009 or the New ELC Award? Both Covered Here

Early years awards in Ireland have changed, and plenty of learners aren't sure which route they're actually on. Your certificate specification settles it — but this is the landscape.

The New ELC Awards — 5M21473 and Related Codes

Built to the Professional Award Standards for Early Learning and Care. Fewer, larger components than the old route, and a formal professional practice placement rather than a general work experience module.

  • 120 credits, typically built from around six larger components
  • Professional Practice Placement in ELC — the placement component itself
  • Early Childhood Curriculum Approaches — Aistear, Síolta, Montessori and others
  • Child development, health and well-being components
  • Some routes embed Special Needs Assisting 5N1786

The Older ECCE Route — 5M2009

Still held by a great many practitioners, and still being completed by learners partway through. The component structure is different, with more separate 15-credit modules.

  • Child Development 5N1764
  • Child Health and Well Being 5N1765
  • Early Childhood Education and Play 5N1773
  • Early Care and Education Practice 5N1770
  • Work Practice 5N1433 or Work Experience 5N1356

Level 6 — Advanced Certificate and Stage 2

The step most early years practitioners take next, and the point where description stops being enough. Level 6 asks you to evaluate your own practice against the frameworks rather than describe it.

  • Stage 2 ELC awards and Advanced Certificate routes
  • Supervision and room leadership components
  • Curriculum planning and evaluation at a deeper level
  • Research or extended project components
  • See QQI Level 6 assignment help for what changes

Child Protection and Safeguarding Content

Appears across almost every early years award and is one place where getting the Irish framework right genuinely matters. Generic international safeguarding theory reads badly to an Irish assessor.

  • Children First national guidance and your setting's own policy
  • The role of the designated liaison person in your setting
  • Recognising, recording and reporting concerns
  • Tusla registration and what it requires of a setting
  • Your own responsibilities and their limits

Inclusion and Additional Needs

Increasingly central to early years assessment, and the area where learners most often write about children rather than with them in mind.

  • Supporting children with additional needs in the room
  • Working alongside an access or inclusion support model
  • Adapting the environment rather than the child
  • Partnership with parents and outside professionals
  • Special Needs Assisting 5N1786 help →

The Assessment Types You'll Face

Early years awards lean heavily on portfolio and placement evidence rather than exams, which suits practitioners and catches out people who expected essays.

Included as Standard

Every Childcare Review Includes Framework and Anonymity Checks

Each targets a specific way early years portfolios lose marks. They arrive with every review rather than sitting behind a premium tier.

Worth €20

Aistear & Síolta Link Audit

INCLUDED

Worth €16

Objectivity Check

INCLUDED

Worth €16

Child Anonymity Check

INCLUDED

Worth €15

Source Verification

INCLUDED

Worth €12

Indicative Band

INCLUDED
Send a Draft and See →
Case Study

From Referred to Merit — One ELC Portfolio, Two Weeks

One early learning portfolio that came back for revision, and the two changes that fixed all fourteen observations at once.

Early Learning and Care — observation portfolio, referred

Learner: M.O.QQI Level 5Community crèche, Athlone

Where she started

M.O. had completed her placement hours and written fourteen observations across two rooms. Her tutor referred the portfolio with the comment that observations "were not sufficiently linked to Aistear". She had linked them — every single one ended with a line naming a theme — so the feedback made no sense to her at all.

What the review found

The links were labels, not arguments. "Links to Aistear: Exploring and Thinking" with nothing explaining why that behaviour demonstrated it. Separately, eleven of fourteen observations contained interpretation inside the record — "he was frustrated", "she wanted to join in" — which belonged in the analysis. Síolta appeared once, in the introduction. Two children were identifiable from a first name plus a stated additional need.

Where it landed

She rewrote the framework paragraphs and moved the interpretation into the analysis sections across all fourteen. Accepted on resubmission with a Merit. ✅

How the reviewer worked through it

  • 1Rewrote one framework link as a worked example so the difference between labelling and explaining was visible
  • 2Highlighted every interpretive phrase sitting inside an observation record, with where each belonged instead
  • 3Matched each observation to a Síolta standard as well as an Aistear theme, since only Aistear had been used
  • 4Flagged the two identifying combinations and suggested replacements that kept the evidence intact
  • 5Noted that eleven of fourteen were narrative observations and suggested two she could convert to time samples

✅ Final Outcome

Accepted at Merit on resubmission. No new placement hours and no new observations were needed.

Send My Observation Portfolio
What a Review Looks Like

A Marked-Up Copy and a Fix List: Your Childcare Review Explained

Anonymised snapshots of the finding, the fix and the movement — across observations, activity planning and placement evidence.

Observation · Preschool

A Schema Named With Nothing Behind It

Planning · Baby Room

An Activity Plan With No Child in It

📘 Activity plan and evaluation

What the review found:A well-structured messy play plan with clear aims and resources, and no reference to any observation of the actual children it was planned for.

The fix supplied:The two observations from her own portfolio that justified this activity, and where to reference them so the plan read as responsive rather than generic.

Indicative band:Mid Pass to high Merit with no change to the activity itself.

Placement · Reflection

Reflections That Never Reached a Next Step

📘 Professional practice reflective journal

What the review found:Honest, thoughtful reflections on how sessions had gone, every one of which ended at "I felt this went well" without identifying anything she would do differently.

The fix supplied:A three-line structure for closing each reflection — what you noticed, what it told you, what you'd provide next — with two rewritten as examples.

Indicative band:Pass to Merit across the whole journal on a repeated structural fix.

Get My Portfolio Reviewed →
Learner Feedback

Early Years Students Rate Our Childcare Assignment Help

Feedback from early years learners, most of them working in a setting while studying. Names shortened at their request — more on our reviews page.

⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

"My tutor kept saying my observations weren't linked to Aistear. They were — I'd written the theme at the bottom of every one. Turns out naming it isn't linking it. Nobody had explained the difference until now."

MOM.O.📍 AthloneELC observation portfolio
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

"Fourteen observations and eleven of them were narrative because it was the one I found easiest. Got told to convert two to time samples and it genuinely showed me things about the child I hadn't noticed."

SBS.B.📍 CavanObservation methods
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

"I'd used a child's first name and mentioned her diagnosis in the same paragraph. Never crossed my mind that put the two together. Very glad that got caught before it went in."

LCL.C.📍 ClonakiltyAnonymity check
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

"All my hours were in the preschool room because that's where I work. Was told in December I'd need the younger age band too. Sorted a second placement in time, but only because I asked early."

HNH.N.📍 CastlebarPlacement planning
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

"My reflections all ended with 'it went well'. Got a three-line structure to finish each one properly and it lifted the whole journal without me writing anything new about the sessions."

RVR.V.📍 DundrumReflective journal
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

"Doing the older ECCE award while my classmates are on the new ELC one and half the advice online didn't apply to me. They knew the difference straight away, which was a relief."

JWJ.W.📍 Wicklow5M2009 ECCE route
Transparent Pricing

Childcare Assignment Help From €35 — Three Observations or All

Observation portfolios build up over a placement, so you can send three observations early or the whole thing at the end. Early is cheaper and considerably more useful — the same fault usually repeats through every entry you write afterwards.

Send three observations, not fifteen. Whatever's wrong with the first three will be wrong with all fifteen, because you'll write them the same way. Three checked in November at €35 usually saves a full portfolio rewrite in April. Deadline already close? See urgent QQI assignment help.
What You're SendingStandard (3+ Days)Priority (24–48 hrs)What's Included
Three Observations (early check)€35€46Framework audit plus the pattern to fix
Full Observation Portfolio€65€85Every observation audited entry by entry
Activity Plans & Evaluations€39€52Linked back to your own observations
Reflective Journal / Placement Record€49€65Next-step structure and evidence check
Full Module (all elements)€89€115Everything above, weighted as your brief weights it
Referral Re-Check After Feedback€25€35Criterion by criterion against your tutor's comments

✔ What Every Childcare Review Includes

Aistear theme and Síolta standard audit
Objectivity check on every observation
Child and setting anonymity verified
Observation method range assessed
Every source verified and corrected
Free follow-up questions after delivery
Get My Exact Price →
Every Early Years Setting

Baby Room to Afterschool — Early Learning Help for Every Setting

Your room decides what evidence is naturally available and which age band you'll be short on. These are the settings most early years portfolios reach us from.

🍼 Baby Rooms (0–2 Years)

The hardest observations to write and the age band most portfolios are short on. Non-verbal children mean the evidence is in gesture, gaze and routine — which takes more care to record objectively, and scores well when it's done properly.

🧸 Toddler Rooms

Rich schema and emerging language evidence, and plenty of social interaction to observe. Also where interpretation most easily creeps into the record, because toddler behaviour invites explanation.

🎨 Preschool & ECCE Rooms

Where most learners work, and therefore where most portfolios are over-weighted. Excellent for language, problem-solving and peer play evidence — just rarely balanced by anything from the younger band.

♿ Inclusion & Additional Needs Settings

Strong material for the inclusion criteria, and the setting where anonymity needs the most care — a stated need plus an age plus a first name identifies a child very quickly.

🏫 Afterschool & School-Age Care

Often outside the age bands your award requires, which catches learners out. Useful experience, but check with your tutor whether the hours count toward your placement requirement before you rely on them.

Whatever Room You're In, the Frameworks Are the Same

ETB, PLC college, private provider or blended online — early years awards are assessed against the same standards, and Aistear and Síolta sit behind all of them.

Start My Review →

⏰ Three Observations Checked Tonight Beats Fifteen in April

Whatever's missing from your first three observations will be missing from every one that follows. Find it in November and the rest of the portfolio writes itself properly.

Check My Observations →
Common Questions

Answers First: Childcare Assignment Help Questions From Learners

Taken from our inbox and from what early years learners ask in course groups when a portfolio comes back for revision.

It means explaining, not labelling. Writing "Links to Aistear: Exploring and Thinking" at the bottom of an observation is naming a theme — assessors read that as a tag. Linking means naming the theme and the aim, then saying why this specific behaviour demonstrates it and what it tells you about that child. It's usually two or three sentences, and it's where the marks are.
The observation records what a camera would have caught — actions, words, sequence, nothing else. The analysis is where you interpret it. Writing "he was frustrated" inside the record is interpretation, and it's the single most common fault we see. What you actually saw was a child pushing the blocks away and turning his body from the table. That belongs in the record; "frustrated" belongs in the analysis.
The professional practice requirement is a minimum of 150 hours across at least two Tusla-registered ELC settings, with hours spread across the younger and older age bands rather than concentrated in one room. Providers split it slightly differently — some specify 75 hours in each band, others a minimum number in a second setting — so check your own programme handbook. The two-band requirement is the part learners most often discover too late.
An early check on three observations starts at €35. A full observation portfolio starts at €65, activity plans at €39, a reflective journal or placement record at €49, and a full module at €89. A referral re-check after tutor feedback is €25. You get a firm figure before committing.
No. Use an initial or "the child", never the setting's name, and watch for combinations — a first name plus an age plus a stated additional need identifies a child even without a surname. Photographs need particular care. Check your provider's rules on parental consent for observation and reference it where your brief requires. Every review we do includes an anonymity check.
Your brief will usually set a number. What matters as much is the spread — across both age bands, across different observation methods, and covering the range of developmental domains rather than fifteen entries all about physical play. A portfolio that hits the count but misses the spread still gets flagged.
Yes — a great many practitioners hold it and learners are still completing it. The component structure differs from the newer ELC awards, with more separate 15-credit modules such as Child Development 5N1764 and Early Childhood Education and Play 5N1773. For questions about how your qualification is recognised for working in the sector, check with your provider or the relevant department, since sector requirements do change.
No — we review and give feedback on your draft. Your work is assessed against the criteria, every source is verified, and you're shown exactly what to fix. You make the edits. On early years awards this isn't negotiable anyway: an observation records a real child on a real day in a room you were standing in, and nobody else can write that.
Check your brief, but usually yes in the analysis section. The trap is name-dropping — citing a theorist without connecting the theory to what you actually observed. One theorist genuinely applied to the behaviour in front of you evidences more than four names in a row. We verify every source is real and correctly cited.
Something specific and achievable in your room. "Continue to support her development" says nothing. "Add larger tongs to the water tray next week to extend the pouring she was repeating, and observe whether she moves to a smaller container" is a next step — it follows from the observation, names a resource, and sets up the following one.
Usually yes, and it's worth checking now rather than in April. ELC awards expect experience across the younger and older age bands, which means most learners need a second setting or a second room. Arranging that takes weeks, so learners who discover it late are the ones who end up deferring. Ask your tutor to confirm your split as early as you can.
Very, in most cases. Early years referrals are usually structural — framework links that label rather than explain, or interpretation sitting in the wrong section — and one fix applies to every observation at once. Send the original with your tutor's exact comments and the re-check is €25.
Yes, and it's a genuine step up rather than more of the same. Level 6 asks you to evaluate practice — yours and the setting's — against the frameworks rather than describe it. Learners who scraped through Level 5 observations often hit that wall early. See QQI Level 6 assignment help for what changes.
Feedback on your own draft is ordinary academic practice — it's what a college writing centre does. You make every edit, so the submitted work remains yours. Policies do differ between providers though, so check your own institution's rules on external feedback before ordering. If yours restricts it, we'd rather you knew first.
Check your provider's rules, since some restrict it. Where it's allowed, the same observed moment can legitimately evidence different outcomes on different modules — but it has to be analysed differently each time, focused on the outcome in question. Submitting the identical passage twice is what causes problems, not observing the same child.
Usually far less than learners fear. Observations are marked on accuracy and objectivity, not elegance — and plain, precise recording of what a child did often scores better than fluent writing that slips into interpretation. Our comments come back as plain instructions, and a good many early years learners we work with are practising in their second or third language.

Send Three ELC Observations Now
— Quote Back in 10 Minutes.

Observations, activity plans, reflective journals or a full placement portfolio — send what you have and a reviewer from Irish early years practice will show you exactly what an assessor can't currently see.

👉 Check My Childcare Portfolio →
Quote in 10 Minutes Early Years Reviewers From €35 Children Kept Anonymous Fully Confidential