๐ฎ๐ช QQI Level 5 ยท Skills Demo 60% ยท Project 40% ยท 15 Credits
Everyone assumes this is the easy elective. You already work with older people, so how hard can it be? Then the project brief arrives asking about demographic trends, the physiology of ageing and attitudes to older people โ and it turns out ageing is the subject, not just the setting you work in. Add a skills demonstration that usually requires a report on someone with dementia or a chronic illness, and it stops being the soft option. We check both halves against the criteria before your assessor does.
Fill in details โ we reply within 10 minutes
Because doing the work and writing about the work are two different skills, and this component quietly tests the second one harder than people expect. You can turn a resident safely, manage a difficult morning with someone in late-stage dementia and spot a change in mood before anyone else โ and still lose marks because the outcome asked you to discuss national demographic trends, or analyse how attitudes to ageing affect the care older people receive. That's academic content, not practical content, and nothing in your working day prepares you to write it.
Your skills demonstration carries most of the component and usually includes a written report on an older person with dementia, a chronic illness or a mobility need. We read it before the project and rank the fix list the way your marks are actually weighted.
This is the one Level 5 care component assessed with a project rather than an assignment, and the difference matters. A project responds to a brief with planning, research and a conclusion. Learners who write four pages of prose lose marks they never knew were there.
Demographic trends, the normal physiology and psychology of ageing, the social impact of an ageing population. This is the material experienced carers most often skim โ and the outcome most often marked as not evidenced.
One outcome asks about differing attitudes to older people. Learners write warmly about their residents and never touch ageism, patronising language or assumptions about capacity โ which is exactly what the criterion wants examined.
Your report describes a real person with a real diagnosis in a named type of setting. We flag anything identifying โ a first name, a room number, a condition paired with an age โ before your work reaches an assessor.
Most 5N2706 learners are working nights and weekends while studying online across eight or nine weeks. Priority review lands in 24โ48 hours so a set of days off is spent rewriting, not waiting on a tutor queue.
Five patterns turn up in nearly every Care of the Older Person submission that comes back for revision โ and experience in the job protects you from none of them.
Demographic trends and the physiology of ageing get two thin paragraphs while the practical sections run long. It's the most predictable mark loss on this component, and it happens because the theory is the part nobody practises daily.
Continuous prose with no aim, no plan, no method and no conclusion. A project responds to a brief and has to show the work behind it โ the structure itself carries marks that flowing paragraphs never claim.
"She is a lovely lady and I always make time for her." Warm, true, and evidencing nothing. The dementia or chronic illness report asks what the condition means for daily care and what you changed because of it.
The outcome asks about differing attitudes to ageing. Most submissions only describe positive ones. Naming the patronising tone, the assumptions about capacity or the "she's 90, what do you expect" comment is what actually meets it.
A list of statutory and voluntary organisations copied from a website, with nothing about what any of them actually did for a person you supported. The outcome asks you to analyse their role, not name them.
None of these are about how well you care for older people. They're about which parts of the brief go unanswered when the practical work feels obvious.
Get My 5N2706 Work Checked โSeven things your two submissions have to deliver between them. Providers word the briefs differently, so check yours โ but this is the territory everyone is assessed on.
Outcome 1 ยท the theory
Healthy ageing, global and national demographic trends, and the normal physiological and psychological processes of getting older. Normal is the key word โ assessors want you to distinguish ageing from illness, which many drafts blur.
Outcome 1 ยท the hard part
The social impact of an ageing population and how differing attitudes shape the care older people receive. This means ageism too โ the assumptions, the tone, the decisions made for people rather than with them.
Outcome 2
How a healthcare assistant promotes positive attitudes to ageing, and what statutory and voluntary agencies actually do for older people's wellbeing. Analyse means show the effect, not list the organisations.
Demo ยท the report
Most briefs require a written report drawn from your experience supporting an older person with dementia, a mental illness, a mobility issue or a long-term condition. It carries real weight and it is not a character description.
Demo ยท the observed part
You will usually be observed carrying out planned tasks in the workplace โ often including an activity or event organised for the client group. Planning and evaluating it is where the marks are, not running it.
Project ยท 40%
Aim, plan, research, findings, conclusion. A project shows the process as well as the result, which is exactly what learners drop when they write it as continuous prose the night before.
Throughout
Choice, independence, privacy and respect running through everything else. Easy to assert and hard to evidence โ one specific moment where a resident's preference changed what you did beats a page of principles.
Send the skills demonstration, the project or both with your brief. Every outcome comes back marked met, partly met or not evidenced, with paragraph references.
Nine-week module, shifts all week, deadline unmoved. Send whatever you have after a shift and the audit is back before your next days off. No account, no payment until you see the price.
Skills demonstration, project or both, plus the brief and criteria sheet. A project outline is enough to start, and starting early is far cheaper.
A firm price and turnaround before you commit to anything. One element or the full component, priced upfront either way.
Your work goes to someone who has worked in Irish nursing homes, dementia units or community care โ not a general academic proofreader.
Every outcome marked met, partly met or not evidenced. Ageing theory checked, the condition report tested for analysis, project structure assessed, sources verified, anonymity confirmed.
A fix list ranked 60/40 the way your marks fall, and you make every change. Follow-up questions cost nothing.
Care of the Older Person mixes academic content about ageing with practical evidence from a real care setting. That combination needs someone who can tell you both that your demographic section is thin and that your account of a hoist transfer doesn't match your unit's policy. Our 5N2706 experts come from Irish older-person care.
"Learners write beautifully about their residents and forget the outcome asked about ageing itself. Those are different things."
"A report that says she is a lovely lady evidences nothing. Say what the dementia changed about her care and you have the mark."
"The organised activity is marked on the planning and the evaluation. Running it well is the part nobody grades."
"A project needs an aim and a conclusion. Four pages of good prose with neither is the most common thing I send back."
Straight from the component specification. Confirm the exact task list against your own provider's brief, since demonstration requirements differ.
Most briefs ask for a written report based on your own experience supporting an older person with a specific condition. It's the piece learners find hardest, because caring for someone well and analysing that care are different tasks.
| If your report is about | What weak evidence looks like | What earns the mark |
|---|---|---|
| Dementia | "She gets confused in the evenings, I sit with her" | What sundowning changed about the routine, and the approach you used instead |
| A mobility issue | "He needs help getting up, we use the hoist" | The assessment behind the equipment choice and how independence was preserved |
| A mental illness | "He can be very down some days" | The signs you monitored, who you reported to, what changed as a result |
| A chronic condition | "She has diabetes so we watch her diet" | The daily adjustments, the monitoring, and the deterioration signs you watch for |
| Any condition | Symptoms copied from a health website | The same information applied to one anonymised person you actually support |
| The person themselves | A warm character description | Their preferences shaping the care, in their words where possible |
What it is and how it typically progresses โ from a credible source, referenced. Two or three sentences, not two pages.
How it presents for them specifically. Initials only, no room, no ward, no age paired with a diagnosis.
The concrete adjustments to their day because of the condition. This is the section assessors read most closely.
Where their preference shaped what happened. One real moment evidences person-centred care better than a paragraph of principles.
Who else was involved โ nurse, GP, physio, family, an outside agency โ and what each contributed.
What you learned and what you'd do differently. Specific and honest beats positive and vague every time.
5N2706 is a minor award, so it stands alone and also counts toward several Level 5 major awards. Which route you're on changes how much the grade matters.
Eight to nine weeks, usually online, taken by carers formalising experience or by people entering older-person care. A valid Level 5 qualification in its own right.
The most common route. 5N2706 is one of the elective options in the Healthcare Support major award, and for anyone working in a nursing home it's usually the easiest elective to evidence.
5N2706 also counts toward other Level 5 major awards, including nursing studies and intellectual disability practice. If nursing is your goal, this component's grade is worth protecting.
Many providers sell 5N2770 and 5N2706 together, and learners write them as if they were the same component. They aren't โ one is assessed with an assignment, the other with a project.
The projects that clear Merit and Distinction most reliably are narrow enough to research properly inside a 15-credit component.
5N2706 rarely arrives alone. These are the components learners most often send us alongside it.
Five checks aimed at exactly how Care of the Older Person marks disappear. They come with every order, whatever you send โ no premium tier, nothing charged as an add-on.
Worth โฌ20
Worth โฌ18
Worth โฌ16
Worth โฌ14
Worth โฌ12
One learner with twenty years in nursing homes whose practical evidence was outstanding and whose theory section was four sentences long.
E.C. had worked in the same nursing home for twenty years and was taking 5N2706 as an elective inside her Healthcare Support award. Her demonstration report on a resident with advanced dementia was, in her tutor's words, the best practical account in the group. Her overall grade came back a low Pass and she genuinely could not understand it.
Two things, both outside the practical work. The ageing theory outcome โ demographics, physiology, attitudes โ had four sentences against it, because she knew the material from life rather than from reading and assumed it didn't need writing down. And her project ran to five pages of continuous prose with no aim, no method and no conclusion. Separately, her dementia report described a lovely woman warmly but never stated what the condition changed about her care.
She added a referenced theory section, restructured the project around an aim and a conclusion, and rewrote six paragraphs of the report. Distinction on resubmission. โ
Distinction on resubmission. No new placement, no new residents โ the practical work had been strong all along.
Four anonymised snapshots of the finding, the fix and the movement โ across the skills demonstration and the project.
What the review found:Three pages of genuine warmth about a resident with advanced dementia, with no statement anywhere of what the condition changed about her daily care.
The fix supplied:Six points where an analytical sentence belonged, each drawn from things the learner had already described โ the altered mealtime, the changed approach at dusk, the shortened choices.
Indicative band:Low Pass to Distinction territory with no new material gathered.
What the review found:An experienced carer who knew the material from life and assumed it therefore didn't need writing. The outcome was marked not evidenced despite everything else being strong.
The fix supplied:A five-point structure covering healthy ageing, national trends, normal physiological change, psychological change and attitudes โ with the type of source that satisfies each.
Indicative band:One outcome moved from not evidenced to met, lifting the whole component two bands.
What the review found:Good material on falls prevention presented as continuous prose. No stated aim, no plan, no method, and an ending that summarised rather than concluded anything.
The fix supplied:A four-part project structure with his existing paragraphs sorted into it, plus the two sentences needed to turn his summary into a conclusion.
Indicative band:Pass to Merit purely on structure, with almost no new writing.
What the review found:A positive, respectful account of attitudes to older people that never mentioned a negative one โ in answer to a criterion asking her to examine differing attitudes.
The fix supplied:Three examples she had already mentioned in passing โ a patronising visitor, an assumption about capacity, a comment about age โ and where each belonged in the argument.
Indicative band:Partly met to met, and the section finally answered the question asked.
Judge it yourself. These are Care of the Older Person learners, nearly all working shifts while studying, saying what changed after a review. Names shortened at their request โ more on our reviews page.
"Twenty years in a nursing home and I got a low Pass. Turned out my theory section was four sentences because I knew it all from doing it. Nobody tells you that has to be written down."
"I wrote five pages about falls prevention and thought it was finished. Was told a project needs an aim and a conclusion. Same words, reorganised, and it went up two bands."
"My dementia report was all about what a lovely woman she is. Got shown that none of it said what the dementia actually changed about her care. Completely different once I saw it."
"The question about attitudes to ageing confused me because I only wrote positive ones. Turns out it wanted the ageism too โ the patronising visitors, the 'she's 90' comments. Obvious afterwards."
"Doing this and Care Skills as a bundle and I'd written them almost identically. One takes an assignment, the other takes a project. Wish I'd known in week one."
"Nine-week online course on top of night shifts. Sent it Sunday, had it back Tuesday, rewrote it on my days off. That turnaround was the only reason I finished."
Send one element or both โ 5N2706 splits cleanly into a skills demonstration and a project, and both together cost less than two separate orders. Every price below is a starting figure; you get an exact quote in 10 minutes and pay nothing until you have seen it.
| What You're Sending | Standard (3+ Days) | Priority (24โ48 hrs) | What's Included |
|---|---|---|---|
| Theory Section Only (early check) | โฌ35 | โฌ46 | Ageing outcomes, sources and structure |
| Project (40%) | โฌ45 | โฌ59 | Aim, plan, findings and conclusion audit |
| Skills Demonstration (60%) | โฌ55 | โฌ72 | Condition report and task coverage check |
| Full Component (both elements) | โฌ89 | โฌ115 | Weighted 60/40 in the fix list |
| 5N2706 + 5N2770 Together | โฌ155 | โฌ195 | Both components plus a cross-component report |
| Referral Re-Check After Feedback | โฌ25 | โฌ35 | Criterion by criterion against your tutor's comments |
Your setting decides which outcome will be hardest to evidence and which project topic is realistically available to you.
The most common setting and the easiest for the demonstration half โ planned tasks, organised activities and condition reports are all readily available. The theory outcomes are still where the marks go missing.
Exceptionally strong material for the condition report, and the setting where person-centred practice is easiest to evidence properly. Anonymity needs extra care because unit populations are small.
Harder for the organised activity element, since you work one-to-one rather than with a group. Much stronger for independence, choice and the role of statutory and voluntary agencies โ worth building your project around that.
Good evidence for healthy ageing, autonomy and social contact โ the outcomes that residential learners find hardest. Often the best setting for a project on loneliness or community involvement.
The demonstration half needs workplace access, so this is the position that causes most late panic. Ask your provider early what they accept โ arrangements vary, and finding out in week seven is too late.
ETB, PLC college, private provider or a fully online module โ 5N2706 is assessed against the same component specification everywhere in Ireland.
Start My Review โTaken from our inbox and from what Care of the Older Person learners ask when a draft comes back with feedback they can't decode.
Theory section, condition report, project or the full component โ send what you have and an expert from Irish older-person care will show you exactly which outcomes aren't yet evidenced.